Blog
Subscribe
PRODUCTHEAD is a newsletter of the best articles, videos and podcasts from product leaders and commentators all over the world, curated by Jock Busuttil. All neatly packaged up in a regular email delivery for your reading, viewing and listening pleasure.
Jock Busuttil publishes articles regularly on I Manage Products, a blog for product people to learn about product management from the ground up.
Recent articles
- PRODUCTHEAD: Escaping ‘analysis paralysis’by Jock Busuttil on August 11, 2025
» AI may help you ship faster, but validating what you shipped still takes time » In large complex organisations, transparent, written communication helps to avoid misinterpretation » A strategy is just a wishlist if you never actually follow through on a decision
- PRODUCTHEAD: Ignoring or embracing complexity?by Jock Busuttil on August 4, 2025
» There may be multiple ‘truths’ about the work depending on how different people frame it » Different groups of people will adopt strategy in stages, and have differing information needs » Fostering collaboration is the necessary first step for an organisation to work with more agility
- PRODUCTHEAD: AI and I have trust issuesby Jock Busuttil on July 28, 2025
» What are the factors that lead us to trust someone (or an AI tool)? » Vibe coding is great for prototyping; but for production code, dev teams still rule
- PRODUCTHEAD: The discovery trapby Jock Busuttil on July 21, 2025
» To keep forward momentum, frame discovery around decision making, not just insight » Product people fight for the users, our teams and the business’s overall health
- PRODUCTHEAD: Healthy slack in the systemby Jock Busuttil on July 14, 2025
» If you think product management is dead, you may not understand what it involves » Human connection is what really knits organisations together, not process and artefacts » Product roadmaps reflect the dysfunction inherent in your organisation
- PRODUCTHEAD: Move fast and break things – AI editionby Jock Busuttil on July 7, 2025
» What happens when anyone in your org can build and ship product? » GenAI is creating a productivity disparity between companies using it by default and those which are not » Investors are increasingly valuing companies based on ‘revenue per employee’ (≈ efficiency)
- PRODUCTHEAD: Job interviews are rubbish / Least evil genAI company / The Great Flatteningby Jock Busuttil on June 30, 2025
» Job interviews are a terrible way to assess how someone will perform in role » All genAI companies are evil, but some are less evil » Accumulated inefficiency has come back to bite organisations – what to do about it
- PRODUCTHEAD: Celebrating Tomer Sharon’s legacyby Jock Busuttil on June 23, 2025
» Tomer Sharon will be remembered for pioneering UX research techniques such as Experience Sampling and Google’s HEART framework
- PRODUCTHEAD: The rift between design and productby Jock Busuttil on June 16, 2025
» Product managers exist in part to free up the specialists to do their thing » Being the point of contact with senior executives and stakeholders tends to also make you accountable to them » Specialists’ expertise is needed to wield a tool effectively, even if it’s easy to use
- Are developers vibe coding themselves out of a job?by Jock Busuttil on June 11, 2025
And is the increasing reliance by junior developers on AI coding assistants storing up a generational skills shortage for the future – ‘professional debt’, if you will?
- PRODUCTHEAD: Bridging cultural dividesby Jock Busuttil on June 9, 2025
» Different cultures communicate with varying directness; context heavily influences interpretation and meaning » Leadership, trust, and decision-making styles differ widely across cultural backgrounds and must be adapted to the team » Bridging cultural divides requires empathy, flexibility, and awareness of one’s own cultural lens
- PRODUCTHEAD: Structuring teams for the work — team topologies and taxonomiesby Jock Busuttil on June 2, 2025
» Organisational changes will reveal weak spots in the current ways of working before you adapt them » Structure teams differently based on the nature of the work » There is value in using shared language to describe how teams differ